|
Our project "Floating Energy" is related to Zhang Qizhi,
who said, that modern confucianism
has to be rational. In the Chinese language the scientific vocabulary
is mostly import and
complicated adaption. Today this is a topic of linguists and sinologists.
And maybe foreign
vocabulary in the Chinese language implicates a subtle logical
dominance. Beginning a logical
interface between the maxims of behaviour in our project "Lun
Yu - Kant" we are convinced,
that there are hidden conformities in "western" and
"Chinese" rationalism and still waiting for
both.
What we are interested in now are the logical strategies of supporting
the changes, say, let the
nature do their things and to live well with it. Especially we
are not convinced, that the western
approach of a final unified theory expresses any wise support
of changes. Our opinion is, that
linguistic implications of the indogermanic civilization take
effect on the discussion of scientific
truth, and the scientific progress maybe a history of oblivion
and neglect along the history of
so called modern languages.
So what could be a language of changes?
Remembering the scientist Niels Bohr we think about floating energy
and "chi". That means, we
think about methods without permanent technical engagement. For
example the nanotechnology
let their things go spontaneous to get microscopical results.
It maybe the same with energy.
Understanding the wisdom of changes and the logic of propensions
we hope to make "hard"
science soft and more rational.
|
